Subscribe to The Tonic
Brooke Rollins, President Trump’s pick for agriculture secretary, is about to take on one of the most influential roles in shaping America’s food and nutrition landscape.
If confirmed, she’ll oversee a department with a $200 billion budget that touches nearly every aspect of food production, from managing crop insurance to regulating school lunches and SNAP benefits. Last week’s confirmation hearing shed light on her priorities, but just like anything else in Washington, the answers left many people with plenty of questions unresolved.
On the surface, Rollins’ views align with traditional conservative approaches.
When pressed on SNAP, the federal nutrition program supporting 40 million Americans, she danced around direct commitments to maintain funding or reject stricter work requirements. Instead, she emphasized ensuring the program’s “efficiency and effectiveness.”
Translation? There is likely room for cuts or restrictions. Maybe?
The real curveball came with her nod to the MAHA movement, championed by RFK Jr. During the hearing, Rollins made an unprompted reference to rising childhood chronic diseases and pledged to address them alongside Bobby Kennedy. It was a subtle yet significant acknowledgment of MAHA’s influence—and a hint at the tightrope she’ll have to walk, balancing traditional ag interests with MAHA’s nutrition-focused agenda.
Interesting.
One of the standout moments of the hearing came when Sen. Cory Booker asked Rollins to commit to reducing ultra-processed foods in school lunches. Without hesitation, she agreed—a stance that could signal a pretty significant shift in USDA policy.
However, the devil is in the details. School meals rely heavily on processed options due to tight budgets and logistical challenges. While her response was encouraging, implementing such changes will require significant investment and structural overhauls. And it would probably cost a lot of money—something that will always appear at odds with the conservative side of the aisle.
Rollins’ balancing act doesn’t stop at school lunches. Her role will require navigating competing priorities: supporting farmers and ranchers, managing the expectations of a health-conscious MAHA base, and dealing with criticism from skeptics on all sides. How fun.
Adding fuel to the fire is the appointment of Kailee Tkacz Buller, a former seed oil industry executive, as USDA chief of staff—a move MAHA advocates have already criticized.
Then there’s the looming question of SNAP purchase restrictions, a proposal backed by Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders to ban “junk food” from the program. Rollins expressed openness to letting states pilot such ideas, framing them as experiments in federalism. Whether this signals a broader push for stricter SNAP policies remains to be seen.
Rollins’ confirmation hearing highlighted the complexities of her upcoming role. And honestly, this is just the tip of the iceberg.
On the one hand, she’s signaling openness to bold ideas like reducing ultra-processed foods and addressing chronic diseases. Awesome news.
On the other, her conservative policy background suggests a cautious approach to expanding federal nutrition programs.
With RFK Jr.’s confirmation hearing this week and growing MAHA momentum, the intersection of politics, food policy, and public health is shaping up to be one of the most fascinating storylines of the year. Will these new players bring meaningful change, or will competing agendas and entrenched interests stall progress?
Here’s to hoping for clarity—and action—in 2025.
We will keep you updated on how it all plays out!
Enjoyed the article? Subscribe.
Comments